Misandry Revealed

Today's Religions section of the Huffington Post had this following Article written about trying to "abolish circumcision".

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miriam-pollack/circumcision-identity-gen_b_1132896.html

My reply:

Thats the most sophisticated piece of misandrous diatribe I have ever witnessed in my entire life ever. 
I must remark that the Foreskin is the element that is removed in a circumcision.  This is NOT the Genitalia organ itself.   To make this assertion is anatomically and physically incorrect and leaps into a realm of poor judgement as well as blasphemy regarding the abuse of medical science and scientific jargon.
In fact, Science has proven that circumcision is medically positive in its benefits.  It is written that in Africa, AIDS transmission is reduced by a statistically significant percentage in those who are circumcised.
The fact is that there is a reason for the circumcision and the Jewish religion is no accident.
G-d is True and if you want to be an atheist, that is your own personal choice.
I also find medical heresy in the assertation that the foreskin is the MOST SENSITIVE part of a man's anatomy.   Foreskin does not have a major amount of neural connections; the sensory innervation of the man's genitalia is in the Corpus Spongiosum and the Corona or Glans Penis.


If you read this article, please scroll down to the comments from the "Jewishphysician" blogger.  That of course is my commentary and you will see that the "intactivist" community has come out in droves and has made an arrogant attempt to smear and marginalize and denigrate me at every turn on this article.  I think that so far, I have over 50 responses it seems from many of them.